Why can't I solve my PDE this way?

$\begingroup$

I'm preparing for my stochastic calculus final and I'm having some problem solving the PDEs that come out of it. The PDE I have is:

$u_t(t,x) + \frac{1}{2}u_{xx}(t,x)=0$

With the boundary condition:

$u(T,x)=e^{-\gamma x^2}$

My professor showed us a way, but its not one I'm hyper comfortable with. I tried to do it in a way that feels natural to me, but it doesn't seem to be working out.

Following the professor's at first, I start with the proposed solution:

$u(t,x)=e^{a(t)x^2+b(t)x+c(t)}$

So, with this:

$u_t=(a'x^2+b'x+c')u$

$u_x=(2ax+b)u$

$u_{xx}=((2ax+b)^2+2a)u = (4a^2x^2+4abx+b^2+2a)u$

To satisfying the PDE, we need $a'x^2+b'x+c'+\frac{1}{2}(4a^2x^2+4abx+b^2+2a)=0$. We can do this by setting the coefficients in front of $x^2$, $x$, and $1$ to zero. Here is where I diverge from my professor's approach. I tried:

$a'+2a^2=0 \Rightarrow \frac{da}{dt}=-2a^2 \Rightarrow a^{-2}da=-2dt \Rightarrow a^{-1} = 2t \Rightarrow a=\frac{1}{2t}$

$b'+2ab=0 \Rightarrow b'+\frac{b}{t}=0 \Rightarrow \frac{db}{dt}=\frac{-b}{t} \Rightarrow -\frac{db}{b}=\frac{dt}{t} \Rightarrow -ln(b)=ln(t) \Rightarrow b=\frac{1}{t}$

Of course, we can also have $b=0$. I supposed I could see this is the correct solution since I need $b(T)=0$. So let's go with that and move on to $c$

$c'+a=0 \Rightarrow c=-\frac{1}{2t} \Rightarrow c =\frac{1}{2}ln(t)$

This seems wrong for two reasons: (1) the solution doesn't leave any room to enforce my boundary conditon; and (b) the solution the professor showed is different.

$\endgroup$ 7 Reset to default

Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Twitter, or Facebook.

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

You Might Also Like